The High Tax Narrative Is a Scam Squashing the American Middle Class Now—and in the Future
- Brian Page
- Apr 27
- 7 min read
Table of Contents
If you listen to political debates, cable news, or social media long enough, you’ll hear the same warning repeated over and over: Americans are overtaxed. Supposedly, taxes are the reason families feel squeezed, prices feel out of control, and the middle class is falling behind.
That story is powerful. It is also deeply misleading.
The real problem facing American families is not high taxes. It is the combination of historically low tax rates at the top, record-breaking federal budget deficits, and a system that forces households to privately pay for things other wealthy nations provide collectively. That mix is quietly crushing middle-class budgets today and making the future even harder to afford.
To understand why, we have to step back from slogans and look at what the data actually says.
Taxes Aren’t High by Historical Standards
One of the most persistent myths in American politics is that today’s tax rates are unusually high. They are not.
For much of the 20th century, the highest federal marginal income tax rate in the United States sat between 70 and 90 percent. Those rates were in place during periods when the American middle class expanded, homeownership rose, and public investments reshaped the economy.
By contrast, today’s top federal marginal income tax rate is 37 percent. That rate is near historic lows, not highs.
This matters because people often misunderstand how marginal tax rates work. A marginal rate does not apply to all income. It applies only to income above a specific threshold. Most households never pay the top rate on most of their earnings. More importantly, capital gains taxes are at historic lows, and these are the rates at which the super wealthy pay taxes.
The Internal Revenue Service explains this clearly in its guidance on tax brackets and marginal rates, but this distinction is routinely ignored in political messaging.
The result is a distorted sense of reality. Americans hear “high taxes” and imagine an unprecedented burden. In truth, federal income taxes—especially for high earners—are far lighter than they were during earlier eras of broad-based growth. The Tax Policy Center documents this long-term decline in top rates and effective tax burdens over time.
Your Effective Federal Income Tax Rate
As you can see from the graphic produced by Yale's Budget Lab, after credits and deductions, nearly half of working age Americans pay no federal income tax.
Click here to calculate your effective tax rate.
The U.S. Is a Low-Tax Country Compared to Its Peers
When we zoom out beyond U.S. borders, the story becomes even clearer.
Among advanced economies, the United States collects far less in total taxes as a share of its economy than most peer nations. According to data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, total U.S. tax revenue sits well below the OECD average.
Countries such as Denmark, France, Germany, and Sweden collect significantly more in taxes relative to GDP. This fact is often cited as proof that those nations are “over-taxed.” But that framing leaves out a crucial piece of context.
As you can see here, those countries do not just collect more taxes. They also provide far more in return.
Other Countries Pay More in Taxes—but Far Less Out of Pocket
This is where the American conversation about taxes goes off the rails, and off the page. You need to scroll to the very bottom of the image above to see how poorly we support the basic necessities of a family.
Healthcare is the most obvious example. In the United States, families pay through premiums, deductibles, copays, coinsurance, and unexpected bills. Even households with employer-sponsored insurance face thousands of dollars in annual out-of-pocket exposure. In many OECD countries, healthcare costs are largely socialized, predictable, and detached from employment.
Childcare tells a similar story. In the U.S., childcare costs routinely rival or exceed housing costs in many metropolitan areas. Families delay having children, reduce work hours, or absorb chronic financial stress because childcare is treated as a private responsibility rather than a shared investment. Other advanced economies heavily subsidize childcare and early education, dramatically lowering household costs.
Transportation adds another hidden burden. In much of the U.S., limited public transit makes car ownership effectively mandatory. Auto loans, insurance, fuel, and maintenance function like a private tax on mobility. Many peer nations invest more heavily in public transportation, reducing the need for households to shoulder these expenses individually.
When Americans compare tax rates without comparing total household costs, they are comparing the wrong thing. Taxes are visible. Private costs are fragmented and opaque. But both hit the same family budget.
The Evolution of America's Affordability Crisis
Decades ago, the remainder of the advanced world invested in its citizens. We divested and lowered taxes. The rich benefited quite a bit. Since 1975, the Rand Corporation found that $79 trillion in wealth has been redistributed from the bottom 90% to the top 1% in the United States.
For the rest of America, the price to live has soared.
Citations
House: This is the median sales price of new houses sold, reported quarterly (1970 values in the low-$20Ks; 2025 Q2 at $410,800) via St. Louis Fed.
Car: The 1970 figure is an average new car price (“Total”) from a historical transportation data table; the 2025 figure is the average transaction price reported by Kelley Blue Book.
College tuition: The 1970–71 number is an NCES historical average tuition & required fees (all institutions). The 2025–26 number is College Board’s published public 4-year in-state average.
Health insurance: There isn’t a single continuous, nationally standardized “average premium” series that cleanly matches employer-plan premiums all the way back to 1970 in one table. So I used a clearly documented 1970 per-enrollee annual hospital-care benefit spending figure as a proxy, and compared it to KFF’s employer premium averages in 2025.
Why Americans Feel Broke Despite “Low Taxes”
This contradiction sits at the heart of the American affordability crisis.
Households are told they live in a low-tax country. Yet they feel financially trapped. That is not because they are irresponsible or financially illiterate. It is because the system pushes essential costs onto families in ways that are unavoidable and volatile.
Healthcare bills arrive unexpectedly. Childcare invoices arrive monthly. Transportation costs spike at the worst possible moments. None of these show up on a tax return, but they function like taxes in practice by reducing disposable income and limiting flexibility.
Other advanced economies spread these costs across society. The U.S. concentrates them at the household level.
That choice reflects decades of policy decisions that prioritize low visible taxes over collective investment, even when the private alternative is more expensive and less efficient.
Deficits Today Are a Tax Increase Tomorrow
The affordability problem becomes even more severe when we look ahead.
The United States is running historically large federal deficits, even during periods of economic growth. These deficits are driven in large part by tax cuts and insufficient revenue, not runaway middle-class benefit programs.
Debt does not disappear. It compounds.
As interest costs rise, more federal dollars are diverted toward servicing past debt rather than investing in infrastructure, education, healthcare, and family supports. This crowds out future spending that could reduce household costs and economic volatility.
When revenue eventually must be raised, history suggests the burden often falls through higher payroll taxes, reduced public services, and increased privatization. In other words, middle-class households pay again—just later, and often more painfully.
Low taxes today paired with high deficits are not a gift to the future. They are a bill deferred with interest.
The Real Scam Is Framing Taxes as the Enemy
The most damaging aspect of the “high tax” narrative is not simply that it is inaccurate. It is that it redirects public anger away from the real drivers of financial stress.
By framing taxes as the primary threat, the conversation avoids harder questions:
Who benefits most from historically low top-end tax rates?
Who gains from deficit-financed policy?
Who absorbs the rising private costs of healthcare, childcare, and transportation?
Middle-class families are encouraged to fight over marginal tax changes while structural affordability problems remain untouched. The result is political gridlock, underinvestment, and a steady erosion of public capacity.
This outcome is not accidental. It is convenient.
What an Honest Conversation Would Sound Like
A serious discussion about affordability would start with different questions.
What do families actually pay in total, not just in taxes?
Which costs create the most financial volatility and stress?
What investments reduce long-term risk instead of shifting it onto individuals?
Advanced economies answer these questions by investing first and collecting revenue to sustain those investments. The U.S. often does the opposite—cutting revenue, underinvesting, and then asking families to fill the gaps privately.
That approach is neither cheaper nor freer. It is simply more fragile and more unequal.
Affordability Is a Policy Choice
The American affordability crisis is not inevitable. It is the result of policy choices—about taxes, deficits, and who is expected to bear risk.
Historically low tax rates at the top have not delivered broad prosperity. Record deficits have not made life easier for families. And privatizing essential services has not lowered costs. It has raised them.
Until Americans stop blaming taxes in the abstract and start examining how money actually flows through the system, the middle class will continue to be squeezed—now and in the future.
The high-tax narrative is not protecting families. It is protecting a system that quietly shifts costs downward and postpones consequences.
And that bill is already coming due.
Professional Support
I support couples who want to better manage money or the home as a team in their relationship. I am also available for group coaching events.
I'm the only Certified Financial Therapist™, Accredited Financial Counselor® and Fair Play Facilitator®, empowering high-achieving couples with systems to manage money and the home as a team — drawn from decades of national leadership and lived experience.
Click here for more details about how and when I can support you.
Modern Husbands Podcast
Winning ideas from experts to manage money and the home as a team. 2023 Plutus Award Finalist: Best Couples or Family Content
🔔 Click here to listen and subscribe to the Modern Husbands Podcast on Apple.
🔔 Click here to listen and subscribe to the Modern Husbands Podcast on Spotify.
Modern Husbands Bimonthly Newsletter
Winning ideas to manage money and the home as a team delivered to your inbox every two weeks. Click here to subscribe.
